Article in the newspaper today, click here. This makes no sense at all. If there was predatory foreclosing happening then I would agree with a moratorium, but that is not the case right now.
Loss mitigation units of mortgage companies are bending over backwards to come up with solutions to help the current home-owner. The last thing mortgage holder wants is another foreclosed property. At the same time there are some home-owners, who have just plain given up. Now the bank does not even have the ability to take owenership of the house for six months if this is passed.
"Just cause" evictions only. Why do we not hold the same standard for the three tenants next to the Hanover? Answer, they are tenants at wills. That means either party can end the tenancy with a 30 day notice. Do we really want the City of Worcester deciding on whether someone can exercise their own property rights?
Will this tighten the already tight credit markets in Worcester if the City of Worcester passes? One would think so when I read that a mandated review by the Superior Court or Housing of the foreclosure that will allow the judge to modify the mortgages?
Whatever happened to responsibility? There is a reason you need to sign your name 20 times to hundreds of pages of paperwork when you got the mortgage. If you do not understand everything then you should have hired a lawyer.
Everyone has good intentions on this but this idea makes no sense and will only make the situation worse.
Same Time Next Year
-
It’s been nearly a year since I wrote about the problems that come from
having 11 bosses who are not on the same page about anything, as well as
suggestion...
2 years ago
