Not to be confused with City Place in West Palm Beach, visited there the other day. Similar to Faneuil Hall in Boston and what expect the developers of CitySquare had it mind.. Absolutlely fabulous, surrounded by office buildings and condos.
3 comments:
Jahn
said...
Nick K today (3-23) has penned a 3 part piece The first part of this piece talks about a group of people who are taking the assesssor to task ... regarding what else........valuations and also about the assessors response to abatement requests. The reality is the assessors office is still trying to figure out how many mistakes were made when the new software system was installed.
Then fast forward....The 2nd part of Nick's piece talks again about Clarks Pilot payments in the amt of $260,000. Nick, Please, I have mentioned this before on here. You're pulling an Obama, with less than full disclosure of all the facts. Nick, honestly, you can keep your current health ins. plan :)
Here's the facts. As part of this pilot payment deal Clark U has been allowed to remove a number of formerly tax paying properties to tax exempt status. In an old post I have noted the removal of these properties will cost the city 160,000 in taxes ....not in assessemnts but in actual real tax dollars and it seems to me it entails 22(?) properties
This leaves the city with a NET PILOT pymnt of only $100,000 and of this much will go towards upgrade to the Clark environs. Basically the city taxpayers got nothing from this deal so called $260,000 Clark Pilot and I am sorry Nick, but you're guilty of misprepreseintign this pilot deal too many times In the T&G. This the 3rd or 4th time you've written with lless than full dislosure on this topic. WHY?
Now I starting to wonder about the completeness of reporting on other issues. Why will you not disclose the COMPLETE facts of this pilot deal? This not the Nick K. have been reading for how many decades now??
Same Time Next Year
-
It’s been nearly a year since I wrote about the problems that come from
having 11 bosses who are not on the same page about anything, as well as
suggestion...
An Economics Professor Visits the National Parks
-
This is a blob post from an economics professor at the University of
Rochester, who spent the summer with some students in Kentucky and comments
on visitin...
Congratulations to Nobel Laureate Richard Thaler!
-
It should surprise no one, and delight everyone, that Richard Thaler has
won this year’s Nobel in economics. Congratulations! Thaler is a big reason
I pe...
SKEWED vs. SEX
-
SEX in skirts. SEX in hair. SEX surely shivers in ice cubes and swims
through Kahlua, but I never could find it.
When I was in 8th grade, a teacher showed...
Sprout has closed.
-
I just want to confirm what many of you know, it is with deep sadness and
regret that we have closed Sprout. Cathy's cancer has returned and it is no
longe...
3 comments:
Nick K today (3-23) has penned a 3 part piece The first part of this piece talks about a group of people who are taking the assesssor to task ... regarding what else........valuations and also about the assessors response to abatement requests. The reality is the assessors office is still trying to figure out how many mistakes were made when the new software system was installed.
Then fast forward....The 2nd part of Nick's piece talks again about Clarks Pilot payments in the amt of $260,000. Nick, Please, I have mentioned this before on here. You're pulling an Obama, with less than full disclosure of all the facts. Nick, honestly, you can keep your current health ins. plan :)
Here's the facts. As part of this pilot payment deal Clark U has been allowed to remove a number of formerly tax paying properties to tax exempt status. In an old post I have noted the removal of these properties will cost the city 160,000 in taxes ....not in assessemnts but in actual real tax dollars and it seems to me it entails 22(?) properties
This leaves the city with a NET PILOT pymnt of only $100,000 and of this much will go towards upgrade to the Clark environs. Basically the city taxpayers got nothing from this deal so called $260,000 Clark Pilot and I am sorry Nick, but you're guilty of misprepreseintign this pilot deal too many times In the T&G. This the 3rd or 4th time you've written with lless than full dislosure on this topic. WHY?
Now I starting to wonder about the completeness of reporting on other issues. Why will you not disclose the COMPLETE facts of this pilot deal? This not the Nick K. have been reading for how many decades now??
telegrsm.com reporting more no-lo income housing in MAin South
Some good Worcester Press.
http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2011/03/23/wowed_in_worcester/?p1=Well_MostPop_Emailed2_HP
Post a Comment